Partner
Mark J. Miller
Learn about Mark’s background and approach to representing injured people.
Read Mark’s bio →When an everyday product causes an injury
Pembroke Pines Product Liability Lawyer
A household appliance, children’s product, or tool can change a day in Pembroke Pines in seconds. If a failure injured you, a replacement alone may leave the medical bills and missed work unanswered. We can examine the product, the events, and the possible legal responsibility.
Free consultation. No attorney fee unless we recover compensation.
50+ years
Combined legal experience
230+ trials
Combined trial experience
South Florida
Served from Pompano Beach
Free consultation
A place to start
The first decisions
The next return or repair can change important evidence.
It is understandable to want the item out of the house. Put safety first, seek treatment, and keep the facts you can document safely. Before a routine warranty return, ask how the unit, labels, and condition can be recorded for an injury review.
Care comes first.
Get medical attention and stop using the suspect item. Do not recharge, restart, or reconnect it to recreate the incident. Follow official safety instructions for a hot battery, fire risk, chemical leak, or recalled product.
Record the details.
Save the receipt or order confirmation, instructions, packaging, and messages. If safe, photograph the unit and model label before they become separated. Write down who was present and what the product did immediately before the injury.
Ask before it changes hands.
An in-store exchange or home service appointment can remove or alter the unit. Keep the appointment and return communications. Discuss safe documentation and preservation before an inspection, without delaying steps needed to remove an immediate hazard.
Not sure whether a product defect, poor maintenance, or someone’s conduct caused the harm? Our Pembroke Pines personal injury team can review how those issues fit together.
More than a broken item
A routine task should not leave you planning the week around treatment.
An injured hand, a burn, or a new limit on walking can make school runs, work, and basic household tasks harder. Those changes belong in the account you give us, alongside the details of the product itself.
Understanding the failure
We examine the failure and the circumstances around it.
The investigation needs to establish more than that an item stopped working. It asks whether a manufacturing, design, or warning issue caused harm under the applicable law. The product’s history and intended use are part of that assessment.
Manufacturing
How it was made
The individual item may differ from its intended design. A bad weld, missing fastener, or contaminated batch can make an otherwise sound product unsafe.
Design
How it was designed
The problem may be built into the product itself. We look at the alleged danger, how the product was expected to work, and the legal test that applies.
Warnings and instructions
What users were told
The review may concern a danger users were not adequately warned about. It also asks whether an adequate warning would have helped prevent this injury.
Who supplied the product?
A manufacturer, component maker, distributor, or seller may need investigation. Being in that chain does not automatically make every business liable.
What does strict liability mean?
It can allow a claim without proving the manufacturer was careless. A defect, the company’s connection to the product, and legal causation still matter. Florida’s Aubin decision discusses those principles.
A useful first conversation
Before you accept the exchange, talk through the injury questions.
Describe the product, the injury, and any response from the business. We can discuss a review without requiring you to identify a defect or know the correct company to name.
The Pembroke Pines circumstances
The exact unit matters more than a similar item on the shelf.
A Pembroke Pines purchase may have come from a local store, an online seller, or equipment supplied for work. Keep the seller’s details and delivery record. A replacement of the same model is not necessarily evidence of the condition of the unit that injured you.
A visitor or renter
If you borrowed or rented the item, identify the owner and any written agreement. Save messages about its condition and the handover. Tell us whether the owner has repaired, returned, or discarded it since the incident.
A resident or worker
For equipment used around the home or on a job, record earlier repairs and who performed them. A maintenance problem can raise a different responsibility question from a manufacturing defect. We review those possibilities together.
Checking for a recall? Search the exact model on the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall page. A recall can provide useful information and safety instructions. It does not decide an individual injury claim, and the absence of one does not settle whether a defect existed.
From review to claim
The claim should explain how this product caused this injury.
The question is not simply whether the product failed. It is how the failure caused your injury and who can legally answer for it.
1
Look at the whole account
We identify the product and the circumstances from the records you have, then look at the businesses involved in making, supplying, maintaining, or controlling it.
2
Test the explanation
Technical review can test the proposed explanation against the unit’s condition and history. Any testing needs a plan that protects safety and records the evidence rather than simply changing it.
3
Connect the injury and losses
Medical evidence and work or household records help show the actual consequences. We assess the claims, insurance, and defenses before suggesting how to move forward.
The right deadline depends on the claim.
Florida law includes a four-year period for certain product-injury actions. Negligence and wrongful death claims can involve shorter, two-year periods. The claim type, dates, and exceptions need careful review under section 95.11.
Many products also face a separate 12-year limit tied to delivery to the first buyer or lessee who was not reselling it. Exceptions and discovery rules can affect the analysis under section 95.031. Do not assume a recent injury means there is plenty of time.
What the injury has changed
A warranty may fix the purchase. Recovery can take much longer.
Compensation depends on the facts, available claims, and proof. We look at the injury’s effects, rather than guessing a value from the product’s cost.
Care and recovery
Treatment, rehabilitation, and supported future care needs may be part of the claim. Product failures can cause serious burn injuries or other lasting harm.
Work and daily life
Lost earnings, reduced ability to work, pain, and loss of normal activities may matter. A catastrophic injury can require a longer view of those needs.
A family’s loss
If the injury was fatal, a wrongful death claim involves its own rules about who can recover and which losses can be included.
Meet Miller & Jacobs
The partners behind the firm
Mark Miller and Rick Jacobs bring decades of combined legal and trial experience to the firm’s work for injured people.
Partner
Rick S. Jacobs
Learn about Rick’s background and experience handling injury cases.
Read Rick’s bio →Before you call
Questions about the next decision
These concerns often come up before anyone knows exactly why a product failed. A consultation can help put your particular facts in context.
The store offered a refund. Does that cover my injury?
A refund from a Pembroke Pines seller does not, by itself, pay for an injury or establish liability. Save the offer, warranty communications, and any release. The wording matters, so obtain a review before signing away possible claims.
Can I ask for help if I was injured while visiting Pembroke Pines?
Yes. Tell us where the injury happened, where you live, and who supplied or now holds the product. Those facts help assess the appropriate forum, governing law, and how evidence can be obtained.
The company says I caused the failure. What now?
Keep the company’s response and explain how you used the item, including changes or repairs. That allegation needs investigation. Under Florida’s comparative fault rules, fault can reduce recovery and, in covered actions, may bar it when the injured person is more than 50% at fault.
Is this the same as joining a class action?
Not necessarily. A case about your physical injury may focus on your own treatment and losses. A class action may concern a different issue, such as buyers’ financial losses. Any related proceeding needs review before deciding how to proceed.
Do I need to know what kind of defect caused the injury?
No. Describe what you observed without trying to test or dismantle the product. Determining whether the issue concerns manufacturing, design, warnings, or another cause is part of the investigation.
The product is already gone. Is it too late to call?
Missing the item can make proof harder, but the remaining evidence still needs assessment. Photos, messages, purchase records, incident reports, and witness accounts may help. Tell us when, why, and to whom the item was returned or discarded.